IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transp/v38y2015i7p709-737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-criteria evaluation of solutions and alternatives for matching capacity to demand in an airport system: the case of London

Author

Listed:
  • Milan Janic

Abstract

This paper applies multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods to the evaluation of solutions and alternatives for matching airport system airside (runway) capacity to demand. For such a purpose, 'building a new runway' is considered as the solution and candidate airports of the system as alternatives for implementing the solution. The alternative airports are characterized by their physical/spatial, operational, economic, environmental, and social performance represented by corresponding indicator systems which, after being defined and estimated under given operating scenarios, are used as evaluation attributes/criteria by the selected MCDM methods. Two MCDM methods - Simple Additive Weighting and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution - are applied to the case of the London airport system to rank and select the preferred alternative from three candidate airports - Heathrow, Gatwick, and Stansted - for where a new runway could be built.

Suggested Citation

  • Milan Janic, 2015. "A multi-criteria evaluation of solutions and alternatives for matching capacity to demand in an airport system: the case of London," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(7), pages 709-737, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:38:y:2015:i:7:p:709-737
    DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2015.1059120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03081060.2015.1059120
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03081060.2015.1059120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bongo, Miriam F. & Ocampo, Lanndon A., 2017. "A hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for mitigating airport congestion: A case in Ninoy Aquino International Airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-16.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:38:y:2015:i:7:p:709-737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GTPT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.