IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v63y2025i8p2947-2969.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Logistics project risk response decision-making for global supply chain resilience and agility: an optimised case-based reasoning

Author

Listed:
  • Xu Zhang
  • Mark Goh
  • Sijun Bai
  • Libiao Bai

Abstract

Logistics projects are critical to the functioning of the global supply chains (GSC), encountering various disruptions and risks. Sound Risk Response Decisions (RRDs) on logistics projects are imperative to ensure the GSC’s resilience and agility. Besides risk correlations, Project Interdependencies (PIs) and Limited Historical Information (LHI) impede RRDs. To address these challenges, an optimised Case-Based Reasoning combining the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Stratified Ordinal Priority Approach (SOPA) is proposed. Risks are categorised as referable and non-referable based on LHI using the Jaccard similarity. The strategies for referable risks are derived from similar cases retrieved through the weights of risks and project attributes and three similarities considering PIs. SOPA is developed to find weights with the Interdependent Uncertain Events (IUEs). DEMATEL is employed to access risk centrality degree similarity considering PIs and risk correlations. Expert input is sought for non-referable risk strategies. An optimisation model incorporating secondary risk correlations is built to generate strategies for all risks. The proposed approach is validated through a numerical example. Analysis informs that (1) PIs, LHI, and IUEs are necessary for sound RRDs; (2) decision outcomes are sensitive to logistics project managers who are risk-averse or exhibit moderate consideration of secondary risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu Zhang & Mark Goh & Sijun Bai & Libiao Bai, 2025. "Logistics project risk response decision-making for global supply chain resilience and agility: an optimised case-based reasoning," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(8), pages 2947-2969, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:63:y:2025:i:8:p:2947-2969
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2024.2414374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2024.2414374
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2024.2414374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:63:y:2025:i:8:p:2947-2969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.