Author
Abstract
This paper describes a methodology for ranking feature selection and clustering methods with user-specific preferences and taking data properties into account. For a better understanding of this paper, the developed methodology is referred to as the Two Machine Learning Procedures, Preferences and Properties (2ML3P) methodology. The 2ML3P methodology aims to support users from multiple domains, such as engineers, who have little expertise in machine learning (ML). It is also independent from the disciplinary core competencies of the manufacturer, with a strong focus on employability in small and mid-sized enterprises (SME). The foundation of the methodology to evaluate the combination of the two machine learning classes is described. It focuses on a range of feature selection and clustering methods, their limitations, and their challenges. The paper covers the concept phase by defining the inputs, such as the specific characteristics of machine learning classes or the properties of the production data and the user preferences. With applied methodologies such as the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), the preferences of the user as valid input are integrated. The scientific contribution of this methodology is the approach to include user preferences and specific data properties in the selection process of two ML methods. As digitalisation progresses, making data-driven decisions in the domains of production and logistics is a goal for many SMEs. This methodology can support a data-driven decision-aid model by providing a guided method, which requires relatively little ML knowledge on the part of the engineer. It allows the user(s) to select the best suited combination of ML methods for a clustering use case.
Suggested Citation
H. von Linde & O. Riedel, 2025.
"A methodology for evaluating feature selection and clustering methods with project-specific requirements,"
International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(5), pages 1692-1706, March.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:63:y:2025:i:5:p:1692-1706
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2024.2384597
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:63:y:2025:i:5:p:1692-1706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.