IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v63y2025i14p5317-5335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mitigating triple-marginalization in a multi-tier product tracking system: blockchain application and real-data validation

Author

Listed:
  • Baozhuang Niu
  • Enkai Zhang
  • Jian Dong

Abstract

Most of product waste is due to label problems and handling errors, some retailers try to use blockchain-based system to tackle food waste. However, blockchain adoption requires the participation of all supply chain members (e.g. suppliers and logistics service providers) while their incentives remain unclear. Considering a multi-tier system comprising a supplier, a retailer and a logistic service provider, we solve a multi-stage optimisation problem when the products stored in advance are subject to shelf-life due date risk while the real-time order is subject to upstream responsive pricing threat. We evaluate the effectiveness of product tracking system based on blockchain applications. Both real-data validation and game theoretic analysis reveal the stakeholder’s participation incentive conflicts and the dark side of triple-marginalization. However, a sequential co-opetition mechanism is capable of coordinating the stakeholders’ preferences for the product tracking system. We further find that saving waste and balancing the advanced and real-time orders do not necessarily indicate improvement of environmental sustainability. We suggest that: Retailers should carefully judge the product tracking system because of the potential lose-lose situation for profitability and sustainability. But once retailers can profit from blockchain adoption, suppliers are likely to profit from joining the blockchain.

Suggested Citation

  • Baozhuang Niu & Enkai Zhang & Jian Dong, 2025. "Mitigating triple-marginalization in a multi-tier product tracking system: blockchain application and real-data validation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(14), pages 5317-5335, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:63:y:2025:i:14:p:5317-5335
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2024.2347559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2024.2347559
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2024.2347559?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:63:y:2025:i:14:p:5317-5335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.