IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v61y2023i7p2322-2338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating two variants of the sequence-dependent robotic assembly line balancing problem by means of a split-based approach

Author

Listed:
  • Youssef Lahrichi
  • David Damand
  • Laurent Deroussi
  • Nathalie Grangeon
  • Sylvie Norre

Abstract

The Robotic Assembly Line Balancing Problem (RALBP) is a joint optimisation problem that is concerned with assigning both assembly operations and robots to workstations that are placed within a straight line. RALBP-2 is the particular problem where the cycle time, which is the maximum time spent on a workstation by the product being assembled, is minimised while the number of workstations is fixed. Sequence-dependent setup times are considered which raises the problem of sequencing the operations assigned to each workstation. Both the durations of the operations and the setup times depend on the robot. Two different variants are identified from literature. The first variant assumes that, given a set of types of robots, each type of robot can be assigned to multiple workstations without any limitation. Given a set of robots, the second variant forces each robot to be assigned to at most one workstation. Both assumptions are studied in this paper. The particular case of a given giant sequence of operations is solved thanks to a polynomial optimal algorithm. The latter algorithm, called split, is then embedded in a metaheuristic framework that explores the space of giant sequences. Benchmark data sets from literature are considered in the experimental section. A comparative study with other methods from literature shows the competitiveness of the suggested approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Youssef Lahrichi & David Damand & Laurent Deroussi & Nathalie Grangeon & Sylvie Norre, 2023. "Investigating two variants of the sequence-dependent robotic assembly line balancing problem by means of a split-based approach," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(7), pages 2322-2338, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:61:y:2023:i:7:p:2322-2338
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2062266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2022.2062266
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2022.2062266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:61:y:2023:i:7:p:2322-2338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.