IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v61y2023i3p939-954.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reputation or warranty, what is more effective against planned obsolescence?

Author

Listed:
  • Richard F. Hartl
  • Peter M. Kort
  • Stefan Wrzaczek

Abstract

In determining the durability of its product a firm faces a trade off. Performing a policy of planned obsolescence by making their products less durable implies that the consumer needs to replace them earlier, which thus enhances demand. However, a lower quality of the product will result in a lower reputation, which in turn will affect demand negatively. In many cases, the government protects the consumer by implementing a warranty period. Our paper studies how a firm should optimally deal with this trade off and react to government policy. We obtain the following results. First, we find that the length of the warranty period has an inverted U-shaped effect on the product life time. Second, if more consumers are aware of the existence of a warranty period and ask for a free product replacement, this will increase the product life time. Third, increasing uncertainty about the breakdown of the product also has an inverted U-shaped effect on the product lifetime.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard F. Hartl & Peter M. Kort & Stefan Wrzaczek, 2023. "Reputation or warranty, what is more effective against planned obsolescence?," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(3), pages 939-954, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:61:y:2023:i:3:p:939-954
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2021.2020929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2021.2020929
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2021.2020929?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:61:y:2023:i:3:p:939-954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.