IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v61y2023i23p8022-8042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of pull management policies for a divergent process with DDMRP buffers: an industrial case study

Author

Listed:
  • Guillaume Dessevre
  • Jacques Lamothe
  • Robert Pellerin
  • Maha Ben Ali
  • Pierre Baptiste
  • Vincent Pomponne

Abstract

Production planning and scheduling for companies with divergent processes, where a single component can be transformed into several finished products, are challenging as planners might face material misallocation issues. In this paper, we address the problem of managing a divergent process with DDMRP stock buffers, where different finished products are bottled with the same component having a fixed batch size. An allocation decision needs to be made to determine the quantities of finished products to be bottled. This study is motivated by a real-life problem faced by a dermo-cosmetic company. We compare and analyze by simulation nine different policies triggering allocation decisions. The first policy is the classic DDMRP rule, while the others are new policies, including a virtual buffer of a generic finished product and ConWIP loops, delaying the allocation decision. Our results show that the policy combining the classic DDMRP rule and a ConWIP loop surrounding a part of the process reduces the work-in-process by 34% compared to the classic DDMRP while ensuring high customer service rates and control of flow times.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillaume Dessevre & Jacques Lamothe & Robert Pellerin & Maha Ben Ali & Pierre Baptiste & Vincent Pomponne, 2023. "Comparison of pull management policies for a divergent process with DDMRP buffers: an industrial case study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(23), pages 8022-8042, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:61:y:2023:i:23:p:8022-8042
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2162997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2022.2162997
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2022.2162997?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:61:y:2023:i:23:p:8022-8042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.