IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v60y2022i11p3569-3588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Addressing the consensus on information sharing in CPFR information systems: Insights from manufacturer – retailer dyads

Author

Listed:
  • Liangqing Zhang
  • Hefu Liu
  • Zhao Cai

Abstract

This study investigated the mechanism of improving consensus between one dominant manufacturer and retailers in evaluating retailers’ information sharing in a Collaborative Planning, Forecasting, and Replenishment (CPFR) system. IT capability, goodwill trust, and competence trust were proposed as antecedents of this consensus based on organizational information processing theory (OIPT). A matched questionnaire survey was conducted, generating 253 manufacturer-retailer dyads for analysis. Consensus on information sharing was operationalized by the degree-symmetric model (DSM). The empirical results showed that retailers’ IT capability, goodwill trust, and competence trust in the dominant manufacturer were positively related to the consensus on information sharing. Furthermore, the interaction between retailers’ IT capability and goodwill trust was negatively related to this consensus, whereas the interaction effect of retailers’ IT capability and competence trust was positive.

Suggested Citation

  • Liangqing Zhang & Hefu Liu & Zhao Cai, 2022. "Addressing the consensus on information sharing in CPFR information systems: Insights from manufacturer – retailer dyads," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(11), pages 3569-3588, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:60:y:2022:i:11:p:3569-3588
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2021.1926569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2021.1926569
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2021.1926569?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:60:y:2022:i:11:p:3569-3588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.