IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v58y2020i4p1092-1106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leasing or buying white goods: comparing manufacturer profitability versus cost to consumer

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia van Loon
  • Charles Delagarde
  • Luk N. Van Wassenhove
  • Aleš Mihelič

Abstract

Remanufacturing can create opportunities for companies to become more sustainable while remaining profitable. However, not all companies will be able to profit from moving towards a closed-loop business model. This paper investigates the profitability of leasing and remanufacturing washing machines for a large white goods producer based on data provided by them. A simple analytical model is built to simultaneously estimate the costs for consumers and costs and profits for the manufacturer under the leasing system. The results are compared with the costs and profitability of the linear system where premium, economy, and budget washing machines are sold to consumers. A sensitivity analysis is conducted on important factors such as repair, administration and transport costs. Using the replacement chain method, we show that the consumer costs of budget washing machines in the sales system is significantly higher than the costs for premium washing machines. Consequently, those consumers would benefit most from a circular system in which premium washing machines are leased against acceptable fees. However, the additional costs for the manufacturer make it a challenge to generate the same level of profit as in the linear system. The research discusses important cost components companies will have to address when making a move towards a circular business model with leasing and remanufacturing.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia van Loon & Charles Delagarde & Luk N. Van Wassenhove & Aleš Mihelič, 2020. "Leasing or buying white goods: comparing manufacturer profitability versus cost to consumer," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 1092-1106, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:58:y:2020:i:4:p:1092-1106
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1612962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2019.1612962
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2019.1612962?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patricia van Loon & Luk N. Van Wassenhove & Ales Mihelic, 2022. "Designing a circular business strategy: 7 years of evolution at a large washing machine manufacturer," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1030-1041, March.
    2. Ece G. Gülserliler & Joseph D. Blackburn & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2022. "Consumer acceptance of circular business models and potential effects on economic performance: The case of washing machines," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 509-521, April.
    3. Johan Vogt Duberg & Jelena Kurilova‐Palisaitiene & Erik Sundin, 2023. "5‐step approach for initiating remanufacturing (5AFIR)," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4360-4370, November.
    4. Haitao Chen & Qiang Xu & Zhaohui Dong & Hetian Zhao, 2023. "Recycling Versus Leasing in Closed-Loop Supply Chain: A Comparative Analysis Anchored on Consumer Ownership Perceptions," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:58:y:2020:i:4:p:1092-1106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.