IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v57y2019i5p1366-1370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on Group Selection with multiple quality characteristics: power comparison of two methods

Author

Listed:
  • W.L. Pearn
  • Chen-ju Lin
  • Y.H. Chen
  • J.Y. Huang

Abstract

The Group Selection problem is an essential problem in the supplier selection process. The objective of the problem is to select a subset of suppliers containing the best among multiple candidate suppliers. Manufacturers should procure parts from the selected suppliers to produce high-quality products. Lin, C.J., W.L. Pearn, J.Y. Huang, and Y.H. Chen [2017. “Group Selection for Processes with Multiple Quality Characteristics.” Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods. doi:10.1080/03610926.2017.1364392] considered the problem under multiple quality characteristics, and proposed the Modified Bonferroni method and the Multiple Comparisons with the Best (MCB) method to tackle the problem. The two methods, however, may select different subset containing the best depending on the magnitude of the differences among the k estimated $C_{\,pk}^T$CpkT index values. In this paper, we derive the power function for the Modified Bonferroni method, and compare the power of the two methods with extensive simulations. The results show that the MCB method is more powerful than the Modified Bonferroni method when the actual number of the best process is one. On the other hand, the Modified Bonferroni method significantly outperforms the MCB method when the actual number of the best process is greater than one. The results provide practitioners with useful reference about the properties of the two methods for supplier selection.

Suggested Citation

  • W.L. Pearn & Chen-ju Lin & Y.H. Chen & J.Y. Huang, 2019. "A note on Group Selection with multiple quality characteristics: power comparison of two methods," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(5), pages 1366-1370, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:57:y:2019:i:5:p:1366-1370
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1476788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2018.1476788
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2018.1476788?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:57:y:2019:i:5:p:1366-1370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.