IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v56y2018i1-2p262-277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A tutorial of integrating duality and branch and bound in earliness–tardiness scheduling with idle insertion time problems

Author

Listed:
  • Michael F. Gorman
  • Daniel G. Conway

Abstract

We present a conceptual tutorial of the value of the dual representation to branching strategies of idle insertion time in a single-machine scheduling problem. We consider the problem where scheduling generally occurs in two phases: a sequence of activities is first determined, then idle time is inserted into the schedule to minimise the sum of early and tardy costs. Typically, the sequence of jobs is determined first using a heuristic method. The idle time insertion problem is solved via linear programming to establish starting and ending times of the activities. In this paper, we show how the dual of the idle time insertion problem can be used as a means of generating insights for earliness–tardiness sequencing algorithms. We provide an extended tutorial on a new way of branching based on dual information. We find that in our simple examples, the search space can be vastly reduced, improving the feasibility of branch-and-bound improvements to heuristic solutions. We suggest that the dual approach is a useful and intuitive way to improve scheduling solutions in short order.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael F. Gorman & Daniel G. Conway, 2018. "A tutorial of integrating duality and branch and bound in earliness–tardiness scheduling with idle insertion time problems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 262-277, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:56:y:2018:i:1-2:p:262-277
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1397794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2017.1397794
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2017.1397794?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:56:y:2018:i:1-2:p:262-277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.