IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v56y2018i1-2p238-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting the two-stage EOQ/EPQ model with inelastic demand: decentralisation and coordination

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Geunes

Abstract

Two-stage operations models serve as a basic unit of analysis for understanding economic trade-offs and conflicting incentives among supply chain partners. We discuss the evolution of such buyer–supplier inventory control models based on the economic order quantity model during the past four decades. In particular, we focus on coordination factors that come into play when the two stages are managed by separate parties based on local incentives. Within this model setting, we characterise conditions under which channel coordination can be achieved using a simple mechanism that does not require costly interaction or negotiation between the two parties. The associated mechanism uses a simple wholesale price with the possible addition of a minimum order quantity (or, alternatively, an associated quantity discount structure). This analysis highlights the key structural drivers that lead to tension between the supplier’s and buyer’s operations preferences and applies a simple approach for mitigating this tension.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Geunes, 2018. "Revisiting the two-stage EOQ/EPQ model with inelastic demand: decentralisation and coordination," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 238-250, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:56:y:2018:i:1-2:p:238-250
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1378829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2017.1378829
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2017.1378829?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:56:y:2018:i:1-2:p:238-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.