IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v9y2011i2p120-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diverse approaches to learning in rural and development studies: review of the literature from the perspective of action learning

Author

Listed:
  • Emilie Coudel
  • Jean-Philippe Tonneau
  • Hélène Rey-Valette

Abstract

In loosely structured environments such as rural areas, the objectives and methods to encourage knowledge creation and learning are still much debated, leading to a wide diversity of learning systems. Using action-learning theory as a standpoint from which to understand this diversity, a review of the literature was conducted and five specific approaches were identified: (1) extension, (2) community learning, (3) organizational capacity building, (4) empowerment, and (5) social learning. Extension systems and organizational capacity building represent an operational perspective mainly focused on acquiring knowledge and changing practices, through single-loop learning processes. Community learning and empowerment were developed as alternative systems, focusing on changes in values, which can be achieved through double-loop learning. Social learning provides insight into the capacity to influence a wider environment through triple-loop learning, although methods are still rarely formalized. The action-learning perspective enables an understanding of the complementarities between approaches, and thus provides insight into how to devise better learning systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Emilie Coudel & Jean-Philippe Tonneau & Hélène Rey-Valette, 2011. "Diverse approaches to learning in rural and development studies: review of the literature from the perspective of action learning," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 120-135, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:9:y:2011:i:2:p:120-135
    DOI: 10.1057/kmrp.2011.12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/kmrp.2011.12
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/kmrp.2011.12?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:9:y:2011:i:2:p:120-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.