IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v6y2008i1p5-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stuff or love? How metaphors direct our efforts to manage knowledge in organisations

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel G Andriessen

Abstract

This position paper addresses the way knowledge is conceptualised in knowledge management (KM) literature and practice. Using the work of Lakoff and Johnson on metaphors it will show how people use metaphors to think and talk about knowledge. In KM literature at least 22 different metaphors for knowledge are used. Further research shows that these metaphors are primarily Western metaphors while in Eastern philosophy many other metaphors for knowledge are used. The choice of metaphors for knowledge has great influence about the way we think about KM. They determine what we diagnose as KM problems in organisations and what we develop as KM solutions. To illustrate this, this paper presents the results of an exercise set up to determine the effect of metaphors on KM approaches in which two challenging metaphors for knowledge were used: knowledge as water and knowledge as love.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel G Andriessen, 2008. "Stuff or love? How metaphors direct our efforts to manage knowledge in organisations," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 5-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:6:y:2008:i:1:p:5-12
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500169
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aurélie Dudézert & Nathalie Mitev & Ewan Oiry, 2021. "Cultural metaphors and KMS appropriation: drawing on Astérix to understand non-use in a large French company," Post-Print hal-03227049, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:6:y:2008:i:1:p:5-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.