IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v23y2025i4p351-371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of organisational learning ambidexterity on process innovation performance: the role of KM capability

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu
  • Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between organisational learning ambidexterity and process innovation in micro and small sized companies and the moderating role of Knowledge Management capability. Exploratory and exploitative learning were conceptualised as multi-dimensional constructs occurring at team and organisational level and as inter-organisational and intra-organisational processes. Regarding the organisational learning ambidexterity, the combined approach was used, which assumes that exploratory and exploitative learning are mutually supportive. Knowledge Management capability was based on three knowledge processes: knowledge acquisition, sharing, and application. Due to the relative lack of validated understanding of the organisational learning ambidexterity effects on process innovation, it contributes to the development of theory explaining this interaction and its effects. The results provide additional insights whether exploitative and exploratory learning are complementary. Finally, Knowledge Management capability plays an important role in the relationship between organisational learning ambidexterity and process innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu, 2025. "The influence of organisational learning ambidexterity on process innovation performance: the role of KM capability," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 351-371, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:23:y:2025:i:4:p:351-371
    DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2024.2380734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14778238.2024.2380734
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14778238.2024.2380734?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:23:y:2025:i:4:p:351-371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.