IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v21y2023i6p1071-1083.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging organisational and individual green actions through green knowledge sharing & individual values

Author

Listed:
  • Ishfaq Ahmed
  • Talat Islam
  • Aeina Umar

Abstract

The increased environmental concerns demand the attention of all stakeholders, while organisations and their employees are the most important of them. Adjacent to this, the core aim of this study is to investigate the impact of green human resource management (GHRM) practices on employees’ green organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) through the mediation of green knowledge sharing (GKS) behaviour and moderation of individual green values (IGV). The study collected 354 responses from employees through a questionnaire-based survey in two waves. The structural equation modelling analysis confirms that employee GKS behaviour mediates the relationship between GHRM practices and green OCB, which IGV magnifies the GHRM practices and GKS behaviour relationship. This study contributes to the existing literature by empirically investigating under-explored mechanisms as GKS and IGV have been mainly ignored as explanatory mechanisms and boundary conditions. Based on the empirical findings, implications and future directions are also provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Ishfaq Ahmed & Talat Islam & Aeina Umar, 2023. "Bridging organisational and individual green actions through green knowledge sharing & individual values," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 1071-1083, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:21:y:2023:i:6:p:1071-1083
    DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2022.2139774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14778238.2022.2139774
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14778238.2022.2139774?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:21:y:2023:i:6:p:1071-1083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.