IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v21y2023i4p864-875.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolutionary models of academic spin-offs establishment - comparison of Catalonia and South-Moravian region

Author

Listed:
  • Michal Hrivnák
  • Marcela Chreneková
  • Jana Jarábková

Abstract

The transfer of knowledge from universities has received tremendous attention in the scientific literature. This paper contributes to the discussion about the differences in spin-off process in universities, taking different perspective for comparative case study. First, we put a focus on differences in stage-based model of spin-off creation in conditions of university allocated in developed region and dynamically developing region of transitional (post-socialistic) economy. Then we observe different approaches towards spin-off emergence support in case of universities with long- and short-knowledge transfer tradition and different volumes and quality of research output. The results allow us to explain different definitions of spin-off and support mechanisms in spin-off process, while we primarily observe supportive tools of university TLOs in various stages of development of spin-offs. The study delivers practical implications for universities and TLOs that are just setting-up or rethinking the own models of spin-off establishment support.

Suggested Citation

  • Michal Hrivnák & Marcela Chreneková & Jana Jarábková, 2023. "Evolutionary models of academic spin-offs establishment - comparison of Catalonia and South-Moravian region," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 864-875, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:21:y:2023:i:4:p:864-875
    DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2022.2083991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14778238.2022.2083991
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14778238.2022.2083991?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:21:y:2023:i:4:p:864-875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.