IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v21y2023i4p777-794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digitalising the Systematic Literature Review process: the MySLR platform

Author

Listed:
  • Salvatore Ammirato
  • Alberto M. Felicetti
  • Daniele Rogano
  • Roberto Linzalone
  • Vincenzo Corvello

Abstract

The main contribution of this paper is the development of a digital platform to support researchers in conducting systematic literature reviews (SLRs). The digital platform is able to overcome limitations of other available tools to support, in particular, reviews in the organisation and management field of study. The name of this platform is MySLR. After analysing characteristics of main approaches for SLRs, we highlighted limitations of methods and digital platforms currently used to support researchers in SLRs thus we defined an original methodology for digitalising the SLR phases. The methodology, that can overcome limitations of other methods, has been implemented in the MySLR digital platform. To validate the correctness of the methodology and test the robustness of MySLR, a SLR use case has been carried out in the field of human resource management in the context of Industry 4.0. Main results of this SLR have been reported as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Salvatore Ammirato & Alberto M. Felicetti & Daniele Rogano & Roberto Linzalone & Vincenzo Corvello, 2023. "Digitalising the Systematic Literature Review process: the MySLR platform," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 777-794, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:21:y:2023:i:4:p:777-794
    DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2022.2041375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14778238.2022.2041375
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14778238.2022.2041375?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:21:y:2023:i:4:p:777-794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.