IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v21y2023i3p667-676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organisational inertia and the dynamics of multiple organisational routines

Author

Listed:
  • Kazuhiko Ozawa

Abstract

Studies on routine dynamics have argued that as organisational routines are not static and can change endogenously, routines are a source of organisational flexibility and not inertia. However, most studies have taken only single routines as the unit of analysis. This study extends this stream of research by examining multiple routines; drawing on insights from different streams of research, this study furthers our knowledge of multiple-routine dynamics. The aim is to examine whether multiple organisational routines that change endogenously lead to organisational inertia. It argues that even if we take the perspective of routine dynamics research that single routines can change endogenously, multiple routines can be a source of organisational inertia and, thus, impede organisational adaptation, which was overlooked in prior studies. Endogenous change makes routines sub-optimal over time, which increases coordination costs among multiple routines, leading to organisational inertia. The study explores the potential downside of multiple routine dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazuhiko Ozawa, 2023. "Organisational inertia and the dynamics of multiple organisational routines," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 667-676, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:21:y:2023:i:3:p:667-676
    DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2021.1983481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14778238.2021.1983481
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14778238.2021.1983481?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:21:y:2023:i:3:p:667-676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.