IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v19y2021i3p327-340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paradoxical effects of local regulation practices on common resources: evidence from spatial econometrics

Author

Listed:
  • Juying Zeng
  • Ricardo Costa
  • Samuel Ribeiro-Navarrete

Abstract

This paper innovatively applies a spatial lagged model to investigate the consequences of the devolution of environmental regulation in the absence of knowledge-based, sustainability-oriented nested institutions. Chinese provinces are taken as self-organising social groups sharing a common resource of air quality. The spatial measurement shows that air quality has a positive spatial spillover effect on neighbouring provinces. Due to a tragedy-of-the-commons vicious cycle, however, the estimated direct, indirect and overall spatial spillover effects of the provinces’ self-regulation practices on the common resource are all negative. That is, local regulations through investments for waste gas treatment exert paradoxical counter-productive effect on common resource of air quality in the local province and neighbouring provinces. These findings confirm that, in the absence of nested institutions that are based on system-level, sustainability-oriented knowledge management, even commons-protecting actions at individual provincial level may result in jeopardised common resources at the system level.

Suggested Citation

  • Juying Zeng & Ricardo Costa & Samuel Ribeiro-Navarrete, 2021. "Paradoxical effects of local regulation practices on common resources: evidence from spatial econometrics," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 327-340, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:19:y:2021:i:3:p:327-340
    DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2019.1664272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14778238.2019.1664272
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14778238.2019.1664272?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:19:y:2021:i:3:p:327-340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.