IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjsmxx/v8y2014i1p64-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A symbiotic simulation architecture for evaluating UAVs collision avoidance techniques

Author

Listed:
  • J Holt
  • S Biaz
  • L Yilmaz
  • C Affane Aji

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) currently have many real-world applications such as surveying, delivering small packages, and military applications. In order to maintain safe flight, UAVs require collision avoidance to divert them from collisions or other known dangerous paths. Many algorithms have been developed and implemented, but seldom are they compared to each other analytically within a single system. In this paper, an implementation of a symbiotic simulation architecture is described to conduct cyber-physical experiments and to allow different collision avoidance algorithms to be tested in real-time. Three algorithms based on mixed-integer linear programming (MILP), sparse A* search, and artificial potential fields (APF) are implemented, and results of computational experiments are presented. MILP provides the most efficient paths when given enough time. A* and APF exhibit similar performance, with APF being the least computing expensive. On the basis of the results of the experiments, three hybrid algorithms are proposed for future tests using the embedded simulation architecture.

Suggested Citation

  • J Holt & S Biaz & L Yilmaz & C Affane Aji, 2014. "A symbiotic simulation architecture for evaluating UAVs collision avoidance techniques," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 64-75, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:64-75
    DOI: 10.1057/jos.2013.5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/jos.2013.5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/jos.2013.5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:64-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjsm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.