IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjsmxx/v7y2013i2p109-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A simulation study of cadaveric liver allocation with a single-score patient prioritization formula

Author

Listed:
  • W-H Feng
  • N Kong
  • H Wan

Abstract

In this article, we present a simulation study on prioritizing patients for receiving scarce cadaveric liver donations. We propose a ranking formula that combines the four criteria commonly used for prioritizing wait-list liver transplant candidates. We apply the proposed ranking formula to evaluate several system outcomes in a liver-allocation simulation model. For each outcome, we identify promising schemes that outperform the currently implemented scheme by analysing the response surfaces constructed with a mixture design of simulation experiments on the four criteria. We also show that it is unlikely to have a scheme that reduces pretransplant mortality and improves other system outcomes simultaneously. Finally, we conduct sensitivity analyses on the two subjective scalars in the ranking formula. Overall, our simulation study shows that the proposed ranking formula and the mixture design approach allow us to systematically analyse patient prioritization in liver transplantation and allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • W-H Feng & N Kong & H Wan, 2013. "A simulation study of cadaveric liver allocation with a single-score patient prioritization formula," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 109-125, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:7:y:2013:i:2:p:109-125
    DOI: 10.1057/jos.2012.21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/jos.2012.21
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/jos.2012.21?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jack Powers & James M. McGree & David Grieve & Ratna Aseervatham & Suzanne Ryan & Paul Corry, 2023. "Managing surgical waiting lists through dynamic priority scoring," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 533-557, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:7:y:2013:i:2:p:109-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjsm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.