IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjsmxx/v6y2012i2p81-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating production improvement opportunities in a chemical plant: a case study using discrete event simulation

Author

Listed:
  • B Sharda
  • S J Bury

Abstract

This paper presents a case study on using a discrete event simulation-based approach to evaluate the proposed capacity expansion and reliability improvement opportunities at a chemical plant of The Dow Chemical Company. The simulation model was successfully used to evaluate the effect of batch size increase and automation of raw material loading on the plant productivity. In addition, the modelling work identified critical failures that were significant contributors towards production loss. Despite the strong capabilities of simulation for modelling complex system dynamics and uncertainties, there are challenges associated with use of simulation. Simulation projects for such complex systems are typically long term, and require effective stakeholder management techniques for successful execution. We discuss some Six Sigma-based best practices that aid in successful execution of such projects and for ensuring the sustainability of simulation models for evaluating future improvement efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • B Sharda & S J Bury, 2012. "Evaluating production improvement opportunities in a chemical plant: a case study using discrete event simulation," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 81-91, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:6:y:2012:i:2:p:81-91
    DOI: 10.1057/jos.2011.20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/jos.2011.20
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/jos.2011.20?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:6:y:2012:i:2:p:81-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjsm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.