IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjsmxx/v3y2009i3p171-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Success and failure in the simulation of an Accident and Emergency department

Author

Listed:
  • J Bowers
  • M Ghattas
  • G Mould

Abstract

Healthcare simulation has the potential to offer many benefits but the implementation is often problematic. This paper describes the development of a simulation of an Accident and Emergency (A&E) Department in an NHS hospital. The early experience of the client provoked great enthusiasm but ultimately the simulation failed to meet all expectations. The simulation delivered a number of benefits, notably in terms of stimulating constructive debate and helping the stakeholders appreciate the complete A&E system. The project produced a technically proficient tool that was delivered too late to have the desired impact. This mixed record of success appears typical of many simulations. Important lessons were learned, both technically and in the management of client expectations, which have contributed to subsequent successful implementation in other departments of the hospital. The experience suggests that both potential clients and analysts need to establish realistic expectations and appreciate the particular challenges of simulation in a healthcare environment.

Suggested Citation

  • J Bowers & M Ghattas & G Mould, 2009. "Success and failure in the simulation of an Accident and Emergency department," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 171-178, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:3:y:2009:i:3:p:171-178
    DOI: 10.1057/jos.2009.5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/jos.2009.5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/jos.2009.5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:3:y:2009:i:3:p:171-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjsm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.