IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjsmxx/v1y2007i3p215-222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using soft systems methodology to determine the simulation study objectives

Author

Listed:
  • K Kotiadis

Abstract

This paper demonstrates, through a case study in health care, that Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) can be used to determine the conceptual model's most important component, the simulation study objectives. Conceptual modelling is a critical part of the simulation methodology because it is the problem structuring stage in which the questions of what, why and how in terms of modelling the system of interest are answered. Therefore, it is surprising that very little has been done to link problem structuring methods to Discrete Event Simulation (DES). SSM is the most popular problem structuring approach to be used in DES and although various papers advocate its usefulness to the simulation study in general, SSM has not been used it to determine the simulation study objectives. In this study, one of the SSM tools is extended to better fit with the process of eliciting the simulation study objectives and the approach is demonstrated through a case study. This paper provides potential adopters with a set of guidelines for this SSM extension and also provides a discussion on the benefits of using SSM and its potential for being adapted for simulation conceptual modelling. Areas that would benefit from further research are identified.

Suggested Citation

  • K Kotiadis, 2007. "Using soft systems methodology to determine the simulation study objectives," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(3), pages 215-222, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:1:y:2007:i:3:p:215-222
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jos.4250025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/palgrave.jos.4250025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jos.4250025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:1:y:2007:i:3:p:215-222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjsm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.