IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjsmxx/v17y2023i1p94-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling lung cancer diagnostic pathways using discrete event simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Tracey England
  • Paul Harper
  • Tom Crosby
  • Daniel Gartner
  • Edilson F. Arruda
  • Kieran Foley
  • Ian Williamson

Abstract

The United Kingdom has one of the poorest lung cancer survival rates in Europe. In this study, to help design and evaluate a single lung cancer pathway (SCP) for Wales, existing diagnostic pathways and processes have been mapped and then modelled with a discrete event simulation. The validated models have been used to provide key performance indicators and to examine different diagnostic testing strategies. Under the current diagnostic pathways, the mean time to treatment was 72 days for surgery patients, 56 days for chemotherapy patients, and 61 days for radiotherapy patients. Our research demonstrated that by ensuring that the patient attends their first outpatient appointment within 7 days and streamlining the diagnostic tests would have the potential to remove approximately 11 days from the current lung cancer pathway resulting in a 21% increase in patients receiving treatment within the Welsh Government set target of 62 days.

Suggested Citation

  • Tracey England & Paul Harper & Tom Crosby & Daniel Gartner & Edilson F. Arruda & Kieran Foley & Ian Williamson, 2023. "Modelling lung cancer diagnostic pathways using discrete event simulation," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 94-104, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:94-104
    DOI: 10.1080/17477778.2021.1956866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17477778.2021.1956866
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17477778.2021.1956866?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:94-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjsm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.