IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjsmxx/v11y2017i3p285-294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of algorithms to simulate disease transmission

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaobei Shen
  • Zoie Shui-Yee Wong
  • Man Ho Ling
  • David Goldsman
  • Kwok-Leung Tsui

Abstract

A complex model to study the spread of influenza often requires efficient algorithms to simulate disease transmission. This article studies the internal mechanisms of existing algorithms. We compare existing algorithms to simulate disease transmission in an effort to identify impact factors and put forth rules for efficient algorithm selection. Specifically, an algorithm from the infectiousness perspective is recommended when both the transmission probabilities and the fraction of infectious individuals are small, or when the transmission probabilities are large but the fraction is either sufficiently small or sufficiently large. In contrast, an algorithm from the susceptible perspective should be adopted in the case of small transmission probabilities but a large fraction of infectious individuals, or large transmission probabilities and a moderate fraction. This investigation not only helps to guide a more-efficient simulation study of disease transmission in practice but also serves as a prerequisite for the development of more-advanced simulation models.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaobei Shen & Zoie Shui-Yee Wong & Man Ho Ling & David Goldsman & Kwok-Leung Tsui, 2017. "Comparison of algorithms to simulate disease transmission," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 285-294, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:11:y:2017:i:3:p:285-294
    DOI: 10.1057/s41273-016-0003-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/s41273-016-0003-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41273-016-0003-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:11:y:2017:i:3:p:285-294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjsm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.