IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjrtxx/v5y2017i1p16-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An approach to determine a critical size for rolling contact fatigue initiating from rail surface defects

Author

Listed:
  • Zili Li
  • Xin Zhao
  • Rolf Dollevoet

Abstract

A methodology for the determination of a critical size of surface defects, above which RCF can initiate, has been developed and demonstrated with its application to the passive type of squats under typical Dutch railway loading conditions. Such a methodology is based on stress evaluation of transient rolling contact at the defects, for which a detailed 3D frictional rolling contact model is integrated in the vehicle–track interaction system. Through comparing the maximal von Mises stress at defects of different sizes with the tensile strength of the rail material, the critical size is derived for squats. Observations during a field monitoring test show a good validation of the determined critical size. In practice, the critical size can be used for distinguishing between light squats and trivial defects by visual inspection or by automatic image recognition, so that false statistics of squats can be reduced or prevented. With necessary modifications and improvements, the developed methodology may also be applied to RCF of other rolling contact pairs in general, such as bearings and gears.

Suggested Citation

  • Zili Li & Xin Zhao & Rolf Dollevoet, 2017. "An approach to determine a critical size for rolling contact fatigue initiating from rail surface defects," International Journal of Rail Transportation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 16-37, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjrtxx:v:5:y:2017:i:1:p:16-37
    DOI: 10.1080/23248378.2016.1194775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23248378.2016.1194775
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23248378.2016.1194775?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjrtxx:v:5:y:2017:i:1:p:16-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjrt20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.