IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjrtxx/v4y2016i1p37-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A generalized life-cycle cost model for rail transit: making decisions between at-grade mode and underground mode

Author

Listed:
  • Xingju Wang
  • Zhanmin Zhang
  • Jinjie Chen
  • Zhe Han

Abstract

The life-cycle cost of a rail transit system is critical to decision makers when choosing the appropriate mode, e.g., at-grade versus underground, to build a rail transit system over the past decades in China. This is particularly true when private sectors are involved through alternative delivery methods such as public-private partnerships (PPPs). This article proposes a generalized life-cycle model that considers various attributes of rail transit systems common to big cities in China. Line 1 of Shijiazhuang rail transit was employed as a case study to validate the model, where the life-cycle costs of at-grade and underground mode were analysed using both traditional methods mode and the proposed methodology. The analysis results show that, in terms of the generalized life-cycle cost, the underground mode is preferred over the at-grade mode, which is consistent with the current practices of rail transit construction in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingju Wang & Zhanmin Zhang & Jinjie Chen & Zhe Han, 2016. "A generalized life-cycle cost model for rail transit: making decisions between at-grade mode and underground mode," International Journal of Rail Transportation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 37-54, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjrtxx:v:4:y:2016:i:1:p:37-54
    DOI: 10.1080/23248378.2015.1015221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23248378.2015.1015221
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23248378.2015.1015221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjrtxx:v:4:y:2016:i:1:p:37-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjrt20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.