IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v75y2024i4p647-659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The standard reverse approach for decomposing economic inefficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Jesus T. Pastor
  • José L. Zofío
  • Juan Aparicio
  • Fernando Borrás

Abstract

The traditional approach decomposing profit inefficiency into the sum of its technical and its allocative components identifies first the frontier projection of each firm based on the exogenous choice of a specific technical measure, e.g., based on slacks, directional, etc. However, in real life situations, firms and organizations are interested in benchmarking themselves against competitors representing the largest feasible profit improvement given market prices. Resorting to the recently defined general direct approach decomposition of profit inefficiency, which decomposes profit loss into the profit technical gap existing between the firm and its frontier projection, and a remaining profit allocative gap, we introduce a decomposition that endogenizes the technical component. This is achieved by securing technical inefficiency reductions that, simultaneously, search to maximize the profit of the projected benchmark. The proposal defines a new measure of technical inefficiency that corresponds to a monetized version of the weighted additive model. We also present a normalized version of the reversed decomposition that is units’ invariant through the definition of a suitable normalization factor.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesus T. Pastor & José L. Zofío & Juan Aparicio & Fernando Borrás, 2024. "The standard reverse approach for decomposing economic inefficiency," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(4), pages 647-659, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:75:y:2024:i:4:p:647-659
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2023.2198556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2023.2198556
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2023.2198556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:75:y:2024:i:4:p:647-659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.