IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v74y2023i4p1021-1041.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An alternative Bayesian data envelopment analysis approach for correcting bias of efficiency estimators

Author

Listed:
  • Panagiotis D. Zervopoulos
  • Konstantinos Triantis
  • Sokratis Sklavos
  • Angelos Kanas

Abstract

In this study, we introduce an alternative Bayesian data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach yielding consistent efficiency estimators for convex sets. This approach draws on two distributional assumptions, a uniform likelihood and a beta prior. It is known from the literature that the combination of those two distributions leads to a reasonable estimator of the parameter. The prior of our approach is “non-informative” in a relative sense and does not depend on sample size. The consistency of the estimates is proven by formal statistical analysis, empirical analysis using real-world data, and computational analysis using simulated data. Our findings justify the appropriateness of our distributional assumptions and the validity of the presented bias-correction procedure. Our estimates are strongly correlated with the DEA-smoothed bootstrap estimates while presenting lower mean square error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). Specifically, the correlation coefficients range between 0.898 and 0.952. The MSE of the alternative Bayesian DEA estimates gradually decreases while sample size increases. For samples of 500, 1,000 and 1,500 units, the MSE is as low as 6.4×10−4, 1.4×10−4 and 6×10−5, respectively. Also, an inverse relationship between the sample size and the length of the confidence intervals of the alternative Bayesian DEA estimates is present.

Suggested Citation

  • Panagiotis D. Zervopoulos & Konstantinos Triantis & Sokratis Sklavos & Angelos Kanas, 2023. "An alternative Bayesian data envelopment analysis approach for correcting bias of efficiency estimators," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(4), pages 1021-1041, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:4:p:1021-1041
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2022.2053309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2022.2053309
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2022.2053309?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:4:p:1021-1041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.