IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v74y2023i11p2403-2417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning the thresholds in the ORESTE method from historical preference information

Author

Listed:
  • Huchang Liao
  • Keyu Lu
  • Lisheng Jiang

Abstract

The ORESTE (organísation, rangement et Synthèse de données relarionnelles, in French, meaning organization, storage and synthesis of relevant data in English) method is an effective multi-criteria decision-making method which takes into account the importance of both criteria and alternatives. Nevertheless, how to objectively determine the thresholds used in the ORESTE method is still an unsolved issue. In this regard, this study proposes a model that combines the threshold learning method based on historical data and the traditional MCDM (multi-criteria decision-making) method, to learn the thresholds used in the ORESTE method from the preference information provided by stakeholders. We implement a simulation analysis to verify the feasibility of this model and reflect the relation between the weights balancing the importance of alternatives and criteria and the thresholds, and the relation among different thresholds. Finally, an illustration concerning the selection of lung cancer screening methods is given to show the applicability of the threshold learning model. Sensitivity analysis, comparative analysis, and managerial insights are also provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Huchang Liao & Keyu Lu & Lisheng Jiang, 2023. "Learning the thresholds in the ORESTE method from historical preference information," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(11), pages 2403-2417, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:11:p:2403-2417
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2022.2150574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2022.2150574
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2022.2150574?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:11:p:2403-2417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.