IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v72y2021i4p879-888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A decision-making framework based on prospect theory with probabilistic linguistic term sets

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Gu
  • Ying Zheng
  • Xiaoli Tian
  • Zeshui Xu

Abstract

In real-world decisions, we often encounter situations when decision-makers’ (DMs’) preferences can only be expressed as uncertain linguistic terms instead of crisp values. Similarly, when decisions involving several risky prospects with linguistic outcome information, it is a challenge to properly calculate the corresponding prospect values. To address this issue, this paper proposes a decision-making framework based on prospect theory where the outcomes are characterized by probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs). The key contributions of this research are twofold: Firstly, it allows DMs to express their assessment of outcomes in terms of linguistic terms with interval probabilities. Secondly, it furnishes a paradigm to extend prospect theory to accommodate other forms of fuzzy and linguistic input. To begin with, this paper first presents different types of PLTSs. Then, gains and losses are calculated based on the positive and negative reference points and the operation rules of PLTSs. In accordance with the value and probability weight functions, the weighted prospect values are determined. Finally, we apply the decision-making framework to a practical case to illustrate its feasibility under linguistic environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Gu & Ying Zheng & Xiaoli Tian & Zeshui Xu, 2021. "A decision-making framework based on prospect theory with probabilistic linguistic term sets," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(4), pages 879-888, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:72:y:2021:i:4:p:879-888
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2019.1701957
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2019.1701957
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2019.1701957?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:72:y:2021:i:4:p:879-888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.