IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v72y2021i1p227-236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Graph-based rank aggregation method for high-dimensional and partial rankings

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Xiao
  • Hong-Zhong Deng
  • Xin Lu
  • Jun Wu

Abstract

Rank aggregation has recently become a common approach for combining individual rankings into a consensus and for quantifying and improving performance in various applications, such as elections, web page rankings, and sports. During the past few years, rankings from many sources have become increasingly high-dimensional and partial. In this study, we develop a rank aggregation method by constructing a directed weighted competition graph. We introduce the concept of “ratio of out- and in-degrees (ROID)” to transform high-dimensional partial rankings into a single consensus. Moreover, we provide a novel effectiveness measure for the aggregate ranking according to its deviations from the ground truth ranking. The proposed method is compared with four typical methods with synthetic rankings. The results indicate that our method outperforms the other four by a significant margin and can be particularly efficient in aggregating high-dimensional rankings. The empirical results validate the effectiveness and feasibility of our method.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Xiao & Hong-Zhong Deng & Xin Lu & Jun Wu, 2021. "Graph-based rank aggregation method for high-dimensional and partial rankings," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(1), pages 227-236, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:72:y:2021:i:1:p:227-236
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2019.1657365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2019.1657365
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2019.1657365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:72:y:2021:i:1:p:227-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.