IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v71y2020i2p280-300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should competing firms offer ‘Buy n times, get one free’ loyalty programs? A game-theoretic analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Amirhossein Bazargan
  • Saeed Zolfaghari
  • Salma Karray

Abstract

This study investigates the profitability of ‘Buy n, get one free’ loyalty programs (LPs) for competing firms deciding on whether to offer such LP. We use a game-theoretic approach and obtain the equilibrium by considering four subgames; two symmetric ones where both firms either offer or do not offer a LP, and two asymmetric ones where only one firm offers a LP. We derive the demand using an analytical choice model. Then, we obtain the firms’ optimal decision variables (prices and reward periods) and profits for each subgame under different combinations of behavioral parameters of time and reward valuations for both symmetric and asymmetric production cost for the firms. The results show that when customers highly value reward but not time, offering loyalty programs is a dominant strategy. However, under different market conditions, firms face a prisoner dilemma or find that not offering a LP is a dominant equilibrium.

Suggested Citation

  • Amirhossein Bazargan & Saeed Zolfaghari & Salma Karray, 2020. "Should competing firms offer ‘Buy n times, get one free’ loyalty programs? A game-theoretic analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(2), pages 280-300, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:71:y:2020:i:2:p:280-300
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2018.1535266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2018.1535266
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2018.1535266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:71:y:2020:i:2:p:280-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.