IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v69y2018i4p630-644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evolutionary algorithm for subset selection in causal inference models

Author

Listed:
  • Wendy K. Tam Cho

Abstract

Researchers in all disciplines desire to identify causal relationships. Randomized experimental designs isolate the treatment effect and thus permit causal inferences. However, experiments are often prohibitive because resources may be unavailable or the research question may not lend itself to an experimental design. In these cases, a researcher is relegated to analyzing observational data. To make causal inferences from observational data, one must adjust the data so that they resemble data that might have emerged from an experiment. The data adjustment can proceed through a subset selection procedure to identify treatment and control groups that are statistically indistinguishable. Identifying optimal subsets is a challenging problem but a powerful tool. An advance in an operations research solution that is more efficient and identifies empirically more optimal solutions than other proposed algorithms is presented. The computational framework does not replace existing matching algorithms (e.g., propensity score models) but rather further enables and augments the ability of all causal inference models to identify more putatively randomized groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Wendy K. Tam Cho, 2018. "An evolutionary algorithm for subset selection in causal inference models," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(4), pages 630-644, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:69:y:2018:i:4:p:630-644
    DOI: 10.1057/s41274-017-0258-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/s41274-017-0258-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41274-017-0258-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:69:y:2018:i:4:p:630-644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.