Author
Listed:
- Penelope Mitchell
- Kevin M. Curtin
- Nicholas R. Magliocca
Abstract
Disparities in geographic access to medication for opioid use disorder (OUD) are well documented. Further, historical implications of systemic racism and of the longstanding War on Drugs in the United States have driven both social and spatial inequities in access to treatment. This work builds on a previously published spatial access methodology that uses a gravity-based variant of the enhanced two-step floating catchment area model, to determine how OUD pharmacotherapy accessibility varies nationally at the census tract level. Medication for OUD (MOUD) accessibility scores are then analyzed by rurality and racial/ethnic segregation. The Getis-Ord Gi* statistic was used to identify clusters of high or low accessibility to MOUD, while the interaction index was used as a measure of segregation to assess the racial/ethnic population distribution. The results of the clustering statistic, and the associated significance values were then compared to rurality and interaction using the Chi-Square test to determine if hot or cold areas of access are independent of rurality and racial/ethnic spatial distributions. Lastly, the percentage of buprenorphine providers at capacity by census tract was calculated using the binary ‘at-capacity’ data attribute associated with each SAMHSA buprenorphine provider record. The results demonstrate distinct spatial variability of MOUD resources based on urbanicity and racial makeup that have significant implications for intervention or policy reform that seeks to encourage equal access to both treatment modalities.MOUD access varies by racial segregation and ruralityBlack segregated and integrated Black-White urban communities have greater accessibility to both MOUD typesWhite urban communities have significantly lower levels of spatial access to MOUDLow urban MOUD induction and adherence rates of minority populations are likely not strongly driven by spatial access, rather structural, political, physical, and social components are more influential to intervention uptake.97% of buprenorphine providers were at their patient capacity limit prior to the end of the federal DATA waiver process in June 2023.
Suggested Citation
Penelope Mitchell & Kevin M. Curtin & Nicholas R. Magliocca, 2023.
"Race, rurality and geographic accessibility to medication for opioid use disorder in the U.S,"
Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 2270632-227, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tjomxx:v:19:y:2023:i:1:p:2270632
DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2023.2270632
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjomxx:v:19:y:2023:i:1:p:2270632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjom20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.