IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjomxx/v17y2021i1p85-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalities

Author

Listed:
  • Aldo Arranz-López
  • Luis M. Mejía-Macias
  • Julio A. Soria-Lara

Abstract

Evaluating spatial inequalities using a single walking accessibility measure is quite challenging. In response, the paper proposes combining two accessibility measures (real and potential) to provide additional insights into the identification and mapping of spatial inequalities. The municipality of Getafe in the Madrid Metropolitan Area, Spain serves as a case study. A questionnaire, administered via face-to-face interviews, recorded the resident’s walking preferences for reaching in-store retail. A gravity-based model was used to calculate real and potential accessibilities, which were combined to map four accessibility places that originate spatial inequalities: advantageous, moderately advantageous, moderately disadvantageous, and disadvantageous. The results suggest that potential accessibility values are higher than real accessibility values, and the final map shows the city centre residents (mostly seniors) benefit from the advantageous accessibility places. Disadvantageous places are mainly found in the city’s periphery, where younger people live.

Suggested Citation

  • Aldo Arranz-López & Luis M. Mejía-Macias & Julio A. Soria-Lara, 2021. "Combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalities," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 85-94, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjomxx:v:17:y:2021:i:1:p:85-94
    DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2021.1962752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17445647.2021.1962752
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17445647.2021.1962752?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjomxx:v:17:y:2021:i:1:p:85-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjom20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.