Author
Abstract
The analysis of construction safety is essential for identifying weaknesses in management practices and offering strategic insights to enhance overall safety performance. The evolution of construction safety across Chinese provincial-level administrative regions from 2009 to 2021 was examined using the Malmquist productivity index (MPI) and the data envelopment analysis (DEA) window model, with a focus on input-output efficiency and variable returns to scale. Over the past thirteen years, the traditional DEA model has consistently identified five provinces as benchmarks, with the eastern region particularly excelling in construction safety. In the investigation of temporal evolution using DEA-MPI, most regions exhibited higher scores in technical change compared to efficiency change, indicating that improvements in construction safety across Chinese provincial-level administrative regions have primarily been driven by frontier technical innovations. Notably, the central region demonstrated significant improvements in construction safety development between 2009 and 2021. The DEA-window model not only delivered similar performance rankings for provincial-level administrative regions that aligned with those of the traditional DEA model but also provided more precise performance scores, indirectly corroborating the temporal analysis results from the DEA-MPI evaluation. This study employs input-output methodology for identifying provincial construction safety benchmarks and examining provincial construction safety evolution, providing construction policymakers with data-driven and actionable insights to develop targeted macro-level safety improvement strategies.
Suggested Citation
Liangguo Kang, 2025.
"Investigating the evolution of construction safety in Chinese provincial-level administrative regions: a thirteen-year analysis,"
Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 297-327, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tjmaxx:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:297-327
DOI: 10.1080/23270012.2025.2455546
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjmaxx:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:297-327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjma .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.