IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjmaxx/v12y2025i2p229-259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ChatGPT application on quality management: a comprehensive review

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulkadir Atalan

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based ChatGPT application has begun to be discussed in many areas due to its rapid impact on human life. This study provides an overview of the applicability of ChatGPT for quality management and discusses the advantages, disadvantages, limitations, different perspectives, and future concerns of ChatGPT. The current review study reveals the contribution levels of ChatGPT to the effectiveness of decisions that need to be taken into account and implemented in quality management, which is a human-oriented approach. The top 9 (3 main and 6 sub-subjects) titles, abstracts, and keywords for each search term (a total of 166 publications) were analyzed independently to examine all aspects of the topic of this study. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), medRxiv, arXiv, and SSRN databases were used to select relevant articles. Studies emphasize that the ChatGPT application has inevitably become an indispensable tool to provide better service, increase efficiency, and reduce errors by supporting quality management processes. In addition, while analyzing a certain point with specific techniques in quality-related studies, the studies examined indicate that ChatGPT provides continuous improvement and accuracy in quality management because it is a constantly developed and updated model. However, users should note that ChatGPT has many limitations regarding quality management and the need for human expertise and control. As a result, the present review study will contribute to researchers by providing basic suggestions for future quality applications of the ChatGPT tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulkadir Atalan, 2025. "The ChatGPT application on quality management: a comprehensive review," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 229-259, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjmaxx:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:229-259
    DOI: 10.1080/23270012.2025.2484225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23270012.2025.2484225
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23270012.2025.2484225?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjmaxx:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:229-259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjma .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.