IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjmaxx/v10y2023i4p607-624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a novel ensemble learning framework to detect financial reporting misconduct

Author

Listed:
  • Siqi Pan
  • Qiang Ye
  • Wen Shi

Abstract

Our research focuses on detecting financial reporting misconduct and derives a comprehensive misconduct sample using AAERs and intentional restatements. We develop a novel ensemble learning method, Multi-LightGBM, for highly imbalanced classification learning. We adopt a human-machine cooperation feature selection method, which can mitigate the limitation of incomplete theories, enhance the model performance, and guide researchers to develop new theories. We propose a cost-based measure, expected benefits of classification, to evaluate the economic performance of a model. The out-of-sample tests show that Multi-LightGBM, coupled with the features we selected, outperforms other predictive models. The finding that introducing intentional material restatements into our predictive model does not reduce the effectiveness of capturing AAERs has important implications for research on AAERs detection. Moreover, we can identify more misconduct firms with fewer resources by the misconduct sample relative to the standalone AAERs sample, which is quite beneficial for most model users.

Suggested Citation

  • Siqi Pan & Qiang Ye & Wen Shi, 2023. "Using a novel ensemble learning framework to detect financial reporting misconduct," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 607-624, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjmaxx:v:10:y:2023:i:4:p:607-624
    DOI: 10.1080/23270012.2023.2258372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23270012.2023.2258372
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23270012.2023.2258372?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjmaxx:v:10:y:2023:i:4:p:607-624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjma .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.