IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjmaxx/v10y2023i3p550-565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A countermeasure designed to restrain self-serving behavior and strategic rating disclosure of credit rating agencies

Author

Listed:
  • Kittiphod Charoontham
  • Jirawat Worakantak
  • Kessara Kanchanapoom
  • Nartraphee Tancho

Abstract

This study examines an incentive of the credit rating agency (CRA) to exert effort to observe projects’ signals and strategically disclose ratings when the upfront fee and performance-based fee scheme are imposed. Under the upfront fee scheme, the CRA obtains an upfront fee in exchange for its services but gains a performance-based fee only if its ratings accurately foresee the rated project’s outcome. In the setting, an issuer solicits a rating from the CRA, whose conduct of inflating and deflating ratings is considered. In addition, the CRA can endogenously exert effort to observe a project's signal, which specifies the signal accuracy and how much operating costs the CRA incurs. After receiving the observed signal, the CRA can strategically decide to announce a rating corresponding to or contradicting the observed signal. The findings reveal that the performance-based fee scheme incentivizes the CRA to exert greater effort and truthfully disclose a more accurate rating.

Suggested Citation

  • Kittiphod Charoontham & Jirawat Worakantak & Kessara Kanchanapoom & Nartraphee Tancho, 2023. "A countermeasure designed to restrain self-serving behavior and strategic rating disclosure of credit rating agencies," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 550-565, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjmaxx:v:10:y:2023:i:3:p:550-565
    DOI: 10.1080/23270012.2023.2209859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23270012.2023.2209859
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23270012.2023.2209859?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjmaxx:v:10:y:2023:i:3:p:550-565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjma .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.