IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/titdxx/v28y2022i2p251-274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ICT4D evaluation: its foci, challenges, gaps, limitations, and possible approaches for improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Moonjung Yim
  • Ricardo Gomez

Abstract

With significant cases of failures in information and communication technologies for development (ICT4D or ICTD), much attention has been paid to the importance of evaluation to improve project sustainability. Using the Capability Approach and human development notion as a theoretical lens, this study examines the foci of the ICT4D evaluation, its challenges and gaps, and possible approaches to address the challenges and gaps. The study conducted content analyses of 108 peer-reviewed journal articles and 114 aid/development agency reports, and interviews with 24 researchers in the academic and practitioner spheres. The study finds that the foci of the ICT4D evaluation can be described in terms of areas such as continental/regional focus, method and research design, notion of development, and evaluation focus. Moreover, the study finds that challenges exist surrounding impact assessment, which can be addressed by clarifying the development notion–impact connection in the evaluation process and focusing on the evaluation capacity building (ECB) of project participants. In addition, the study highlights the importance of the domain-based approach in the ICT4D evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Moonjung Yim & Ricardo Gomez, 2022. "ICT4D evaluation: its foci, challenges, gaps, limitations, and possible approaches for improvement," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 251-274, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:titdxx:v:28:y:2022:i:2:p:251-274
    DOI: 10.1080/02681102.2021.1951151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02681102.2021.1951151
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02681102.2021.1951151?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:titdxx:v:28:y:2022:i:2:p:251-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/titd20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.