IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/titdxx/v23y2017i3p554-578.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The dominant role of governing structure in cross-sector collaboration in developing China: two case studies of information integration in local government one-stop services

Author

Listed:
  • Nan Zhang
  • Zhikui Lu
  • Yunyun Shou

Abstract

The one-stop services campaign has been a local government administrative innovation in developing China in the last two decades to integrate administrative resources and provide citizens with more convenient services. Public information integration, which is generally seen as a driving force to promote one-stop service transformation, depends on cross-sector collaboration rather than e-government technologies. In the cross-sector collaboration research literature, Bryson’s [(2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–55] framework has achieved an important position for generalizing former theories and factors, asserting the interaction between governing structures and operational processes in collaboration. However, Chinese practices show that benefit divisions and power structures often play more dominant roles than operational factors. Based on Bryson’s framework, this study proposes an extended framework that emphasizes the dominant role of governing structure. It also conducts a comparative case analysis of two information integration projects involving local government one-stop service centers in Beijing and Chengdu. This study attempts to reveal the key determinants of cross-sector collaboration and information integration based on the revised framework in developing China.

Suggested Citation

  • Nan Zhang & Zhikui Lu & Yunyun Shou, 2017. "The dominant role of governing structure in cross-sector collaboration in developing China: two case studies of information integration in local government one-stop services," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 554-578, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:titdxx:v:23:y:2017:i:3:p:554-578
    DOI: 10.1080/02681102.2017.1363030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02681102.2017.1363030
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02681102.2017.1363030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:titdxx:v:23:y:2017:i:3:p:554-578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/titd20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.