IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/thssxx/v7y2018i2p120-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing repeated hospital readmissions using data mining techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Ofir Ben-Assuli
  • Rema Padman

Abstract

Few studies have examined how to identify future readmission of patients with a large number of repeat emergency department (ED) visits. We explore 30-day readmission risk prediction using Microsoft’s AZURE machine learning software and compare five classification methods: Logistic Regression, Boosted Decision Trees (BDTs), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Bayes Point Machine (BPM), and Two-Class Neural Network (TCNN). We predict the last readmission visit of frequent ED patients extracted from the electronic health records of their 8455 penultimate visits. The methods show differential improvement, with the BDT indicating marginally better AUC (area under the ROC curve) than logistic regression and BPM, followed by the TCNN and SVM. A comparison of BDT and Logistic Regression results for correct and incorrect classification highlights the similarities and differences in the significant predictors identified by each method. Future research may incorporate time-varying covariates to identify other longitudinal factors that can lead to readmission risk reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Ofir Ben-Assuli & Rema Padman, 2018. "Analysing repeated hospital readmissions using data mining techniques," Health Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 120-134, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:7:y:2018:i:2:p:120-134
    DOI: 10.1080/20476965.2017.1390635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20476965.2017.1390635
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20476965.2017.1390635?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:7:y:2018:i:2:p:120-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/thss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.