IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/thssxx/v2y2013i3p213-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying better systems design in Australian maternity care: a Boundary Critique analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Roslyn Donnellan-Fernandez
  • Lareen Newman
  • Kerreen Reiger
  • Sally K Tracy

Abstract

This paper examines the background and limitations of maternity care policy and provision in Australia using the Boundary Critique (BC) method from critical systems thinking. We argue that the historical legacy of funding maternity care within medically dominated fee-for-service structures and acute hospital budgets is seriously flawed. Furthermore, it cannot deliver the policy goals of healthy and socially equitable birth practices. Despite the 2009 national Maternity Services Review (MSR) and progress of a National Maternity Services Plan (2011), most mainstream Australian maternity services remain out-of-step with both health service research and evidence-based ‘best practice’. The present system drives unnecessary clinical interventions, increased expenditure, short-term adverse health outcomes and the potential for a larger, unacknowledged legacy of future chronic disease. By contrast, BC analysis suggests that redesigning for good maternity service provision can act as a population-level preventative health strategy, offering better value, better health and improved equity in maternity care.

Suggested Citation

  • Roslyn Donnellan-Fernandez & Lareen Newman & Kerreen Reiger & Sally K Tracy, 2013. "Identifying better systems design in Australian maternity care: a Boundary Critique analysis," Health Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 213-225, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:2:y:2013:i:3:p:213-225
    DOI: 10.1057/hs.2013.7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/hs.2013.7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/hs.2013.7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:2:y:2013:i:3:p:213-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/thss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.