IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/thssxx/v10y2021i4p286-297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing operating theatre schedules using partitioned graph colouring techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Kheiri
  • Rhyd Lewis
  • Jonathan Thompson
  • Paul Harper

Abstract

In hospitals, scheduled operations can often be cancelled in large numbers due to the unavailability of beds for post-operation recovery. Operating theatre scheduling is known to be an $${\mathcal N}{\mathcal P}$$NP-hard optimisation problem. Previous studies have shown that the correct scheduling of surgical procedures can have a positive impact on the availability of beds in hospital wards, thereby allowing a reduction in number of elective operation cancellations. This study proposes an exact technique based on the partitioned graph colouring problem for constructing optimal master surgery schedules, with the goal of minimising the number of cancellations. The resultant schedules are then simulated in order to measure how well they cope with the stochastic nature of patient arrivals. Our results show that the utilisation of post-operative beds can be increased, whilst the number of cancellations can be decreased, which may ultimately lead to greater patient throughput and reduced waiting times. A scenario-based model has also been employed to integrate the stochastic-nature associated with the bed requirements into the optimisation process. The results indicate that the proposed model can lead to more robust solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Kheiri & Rhyd Lewis & Jonathan Thompson & Paul Harper, 2021. "Constructing operating theatre schedules using partitioned graph colouring techniques," Health Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 286-297, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:286-297
    DOI: 10.1080/20476965.2020.1796530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20476965.2020.1796530
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20476965.2020.1796530?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:286-297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/thss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.