Author
Listed:
- Natalie Meyer
- Simona Trandafir
Abstract
Green rooftops (GRs) offer sustainable solutions to urban environmental challenges, yet public preferences and perceptions remain understudied. To address this gap, a choice-based survey engaging over 600 United States (US) residents from the state of Rhode Island (RI) examined the trade-offs and perceived value of GR space allocations for agriculture, renewable energy (solar), and recreational areas within intensive GR designs. Using latent class modelling to analyse these trade-offs, two distinct groups emerged. Class 1, representing 20% of respondents, notably differs from class 2 by being generally unsupportive of GR installation, and expressing disutility towards GR space allocation for solar energy. Both classes uniformly favour allocating GR space for agriculture production and have a positive willingness to pay for this feature. Interestingly, respondents in both classes trust Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) more than federal or state entities to guide GR-related policy decisions, highlighting the need for localized governance. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating agricultural production into GRs designs while addressing diverse preferences for solar allocation. Policymakers in RI should leverage the potential for GR to enhance urban resilience and meet public expectations by aligning their strategies with sustainability goals and local community priorities.Key Policy HighlightsRhode Island residents show strong support for green rooftops (GRs), especially those that prioritize agriculture over solar energy, with the highest willingness to pay observed for rooftop farming space.Public trust in NGOs to lead GR programmes surpasses trust in state or federal agencies, suggesting collaborative governance models may enhance public buy-in and programme success.Although most respondents support solar integration, 20% exhibit reluctance or require compensation, highlighting the need for hybrid designs and inclusive messaging.Community engagement – especially education and outreach – can improve acceptance among GR Skeptics and should be central to implementation strategies.Given RI's high farmland costs, rooftop agriculture offers a scalable solution for local food production and urban resilience, meriting targeted incentives for commercial and institutional property owners
Suggested Citation
Natalie Meyer & Simona Trandafir, 2026.
"Strengthening urban resilience in the United States: community preferences for green rooftops integrating agriculture and solar energy,"
Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 141-159, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:teepxx:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:141-159
DOI: 10.1080/21606544.2026.2667149
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:teepxx:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:141-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/teep20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.