IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/teepxx/v10y2021i2p214-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The 2018 reform of EU ETS: consequences for project appraisal

Author

Listed:
  • Per-Olov Johansson

Abstract

The European Union’s Emissions Trading System used to be a cap-and-trade scheme with a fixed supply of permits. However, a recent reform of the system ‘punctures the waterbed’ by making the supply of permits endogenous.The current paper discusses how to handle permits in economic evaluations such as cost–benefit analysis. It derives general equilibrium rules for schemes with a fixed cap as well as schemes with an endogenous cap.The paper also derives a cost–benefit rule to use when an exogenous reduction in emissions causes an induced intertemporal change in the supply of permits, what is termed a (positive or negative) permit multiplier, under an endogenous cap. For example, an induced reduction in emissions is associated with climate-related benefits but comes at a cost as production is displaced when the number of available permits decreases. The permit multiplier implies that emissions within the EU ETS are valued differently from emissions occurring elsewhere even under an endogenous cap.A further novel result is that an endogenous cap could increase the social profitability of abatement efforts. By replacing purchases of permits, abatement could cause a reduction in the endogenous supply of permits and hence emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Per-Olov Johansson, 2021. "The 2018 reform of EU ETS: consequences for project appraisal," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 214-221, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:teepxx:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:214-221
    DOI: 10.1080/21606544.2020.1835738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21606544.2020.1835738
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21606544.2020.1835738?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:teepxx:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:214-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/teep20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.