IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcybxx/v7y2021i1p11-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Result attack: a privacy breaching attack for personal data through K-means algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Sharath Yaji
  • Neelima Bayyapu

Abstract

Protecting data privacy concerns the most significant challenge of the present era. This paper is an attempt to demonstrate how machine learning can be used by an attacker to compromise data privacy. To demonstrate, we have chosen an attack on handwritten signatures. The attacker utilizes available signatures for training and appends malicious signatures to be used in the testing process until he gets the desired result. The attacker manipulates the achieved result to perform the malicious attack. We propose, result attack to highlight the need for ensuring the secrecy of the genuine signature. An illustration is performed by applying the K-means algorithm to the MNIST dataset. Differential Privacy (DP) is adopted for defense discussion. The illustration of DP is produced by aggregating red or white noise to the MNIST dataset. Observation shows, the aggregation of noise to personal data successfully delivers defense against the result attack. We get the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the original dataset as 0.878719, original dataset vs aggregated red noise as 0.4999901, and original dataset vs white noise as 0.4448475. This concludes for the defense model, aggregating white noise is better than red noise, i.e. white noise aggregation is 11% better than red noise.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharath Yaji & Neelima Bayyapu, 2021. "Result attack: a privacy breaching attack for personal data through K-means algorithm," Cyber-Physical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 11-40, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcybxx:v:7:y:2021:i:1:p:11-40
    DOI: 10.1080/23335777.2020.1811380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23335777.2020.1811380
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23335777.2020.1811380?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcybxx:v:7:y:2021:i:1:p:11-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcyb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.